Is it possible to create an 'errata' forum ? Now that more numerous (and complex) previews are available, there may be some possibility for the fans to help proof-read the different .pdf.
That would be only for typos, layout problems, not discussion about choice of foreigner terms (I know I'm among the nit-pickers there)... Well just adding additional eyes to the process, much like what is done over the CBT forum.
By the way, James' excerpt part deux, page 6, 'Aigle' has been written 'Agile' in the write-up: which is the right one ? 'Aigle' fits the the faucon name, but agile fits with the previous name in the class (Ardent)