While I'm not opposed to doing a comic, It's going to be a commitment in time and effort. Unless it's a story I'm particularly eager to illustrate (maybe one of my making... I am a writer as well), the only way I could seriously consider something like this is if I'm contracted to do so.
There are other things to consider as well, since the only visual elements set in stone are the British and French ship designs up on the main gallery. I'd be swinging a free hand in defining the elements for things without a visual identity (say, uniforms, other ship designs). While my art seems to be appreciated from the community and I'd love the chance to define these things as a fan, I can only wonder how the official heads in charge of the game would respond.
Whatever the case, this is a fun universe to draw in.
So, some thoughts on where I go with drawing these things.
1. Germany. Since it seems Brittan and France took the lead in LEV development, Germany was in a position to watch both and develop their own system based on the lessons learned from their neighbors. The common hull form of the Imperial Luftmarine was the 'helmut' design, with sloped sides to the top and a wide base. This was a compromise in Electroid use and stability from the mono- and tri-balance designs, which used one and three rows of Electroid cells respectively. The flight of the Imperial Cruiser
Furst Bismark under this system bore out some merit in the design. The Germans were also the first to pull away from the idea of wide vertical stabilizers, though only a few designs omitted them entirely.
2. America. Even without the benefit of espionage or seeing the inner workings of the existing Leviathan designs, American ingenuity found a way when it faced a growing imbalance of naval force at the onset of the 1880s. With only a fleet of relics from the civil war (and among them less than a dozen combat-worthy LEVs of the first generation), America needed to modernize in the quickest way possible. In the congressional battle between navy interests and those of the budding air corps, the latter undercut the situation by adopting the designs of John Chaste, an inventor in the united states who created an independent suspension system. It was implemented into the BB-1
Indiana, and has been the foundation of American LEV designs since. A little wider than the German system, the American design suspended the Electroid in the center of the ship while adding a weighted keel to the bottom. Reminiscent of work in early submarines, this would create a very stable platform to later allow American designs to mount increasingly heavy canon with little fear of recoil.
3. Spain. Like America, Spain's LEV program adopted the works of an eccentric. In this instance it was a French Designer, Louis Dupont, who could not solicit attention from native French designers (who were already into the second generation). Proposing a catamaran system, the theory was that the redundancy could allow an airship to survive otherwise crippling damage and still remain aloft. It also better protected the interior, which would lead to interesting carrier proposals in the 1920s. Though perhaps more stable than even the American designs, the Spanish Armada never really saw success with this design during the Spanish-American war.
...that's what I think, anyway.
