Author Topic: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)  (Read 634 times)

Neko_Bijin

  • Airman Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« on: February 03, 2010, 10:34:46 PM »
  • How long does it take a swabbie to get his "sky legs?"
  • What's the Leviathan equivalent of bilge?
  • Do governments have a monopoly on the technology, or are there private ships plying the skies?
  • If yes, do states still issue letters of marque and reprisal in this timeline?
  • Can Leviathans be made airtight and submersible?
  • Since the laws of physics are different in this timeline, will be offered a primer on atomic theory as understood by its denizens?
  • Have ye seen me mizzenmast?  It's mizzen.

My Other Airborne Dreadnought is a Pontiac

Leaderoforcs

  • Able Airman
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Annoying Insect
    • View Profile
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2010, 10:40:16 PM »
1. Depends on the swabbie.
2. I don't know what a 'bilge' is at the best of times.
3. I doubt it, but I also doubt a significant private presence.
4. Why not? :D
5. I image, since we do have these things call submarines which do almost exactly what you describe at this point in the timeline.
6. Are we sure all laws of physics are different?  Maybe electroid is an isolated occurance.
7. Would it also happen to be a mast?


Able Airman, Damage Control Section
Long Service and Good Conduct Medal (Top Time Online #1)
Distinguished Service Medal (Top Poster #5)
Conspicuous Gallantry Medal (Top topic starter T#5)
Sky Fleet Medal (Member)

Worktroll

  • Administrator
  • Leading Airman
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
  • Konter-Admiral, K.u.K. Luftflotte
    • View Profile
    • Monsters in the Sky!
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2010, 10:47:53 PM »
1) Some never do. Some take to the prospect of the "first step" with ease. If a crewman hasn't found his air legs after a couple of cruises, he's probably in line for transfer. Of course, some say you don't get your air legs until you've experienced soroche.

2) Oddly enough, the bilge. Even though water's not leaking in, dust, detritus, and other light objects can be attracted to electroid tanks when agitated, and fall off later when power is removed. These accumulate in inconvenient parts of the vessel, and need cleaning.

3) Governments don't have a monopoly on the technology - they are however the only ones with enough money etc to operate the elefacturies where electroid is manufactured. Ton upon ton of coal are consumed in these 'dark, satanic mills' to produce mere gallons of electroid. The plants are also potentially lethal - the enormous current and voltage required mean that 'sparkies' do indeed fall into two categories - the quick, and the dead.

4) Oddly enough, no government had repealed those sorts of laws. Certainly, they weren't in common use however.

5) Interesting question. You know, I don't believe anyone's come out and said they've tried either.
Making them watertight would indeed be possible, but annoying for the crew - there are usually large loading hatches in the lower hull for hauling coal and other material. Airtight? The maximum ceiling Levs can reach (a carefully kept secret) certainly causes some issues, but airmen are bred tough, y'know. All this talk of 'parachutes' and 'air masks' - it's just pampering them.
Submersible? How would you keep the furnaces for the boilers going?

6) Atomic theory?
Quote
The ultimate, indivisible unit of matter. It is distinguished from the corpuscle, also the ultimate, indivisible unit of matter, by a closer resemblance to the atom, also the ultimate, indivisible unit of matter. Three great scientific theories of the structure of the universe are the molecular, the corpuscular and the atomic. A fourth affirms, with Haeckel, the condensation of precipitation of matter from ether -- whose existence is proved by the condensation of precipitation. The present trend of scientific thought is toward the theory of ions. The ion differs from the molecule, the corpuscle and the atom in that it is an ion. A fifth theory is held by idiots, but it is doubtful if they know any more about the matter than the others.


7) Bad puns will get you the chance to do the God Walk ... ;)


Sky Captain Sulla

  • Administrator
  • Airman Recruit
  • *****
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2010, 12:15:54 AM »
How would you keep the furnaces for the boilers going?

Phlogiston tanks, definitely. Only for use underwater.

glitterboy2098

  • Airman Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2010, 07:25:26 PM »
actually, even at that point you had desiel engines and battery banks that could propel a decently sized ship underwater. they also understood using things like peroxide for AIP, it was just a bit too hit or miss at the time (quality control for the peroxide, storage of the volitile material) to make it worthwhile for extensive use.

i suspect that you could easily build a smaller Leviathan with some of the hardware of submarines...just why would you? lurking underwater doesn't seem like a very practical way to use a leviathan.
"Fire on the fleet."
"Which one?"

EasyEight

  • Airman Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2010, 07:35:17 PM »
"lurking underwater doesn't seem like a very practical way to use a leviathan."

If you can make a Leviathan airtight, it would certainly be a way to avoid aerial patrols and sneak into a secure facility or harbor, let it conduct sneak attacks and use  deep water body as a way run for cover and avoid larger ships. Sounds like a very lethal way to use a Leviathan of a certain size.

Worktroll

  • Administrator
  • Leading Airman
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
  • Konter-Admiral, K.u.K. Luftflotte
    • View Profile
    • Monsters in the Sky!
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2010, 07:47:47 PM »
TOday's exercise: look up the mighty K-class submarines ;)

(One of the main reasons we're set pre-"real" WW1: I love inefficient, clunky machinery)

W.

EasyEight

  • Airman Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2010, 07:50:56 PM »
And don't forget the Surcouf -- closer to WW2 tech, but an example of a "main gun" submarine:

http://ahoy.tk-jk.net/macslog/FrenchSubmarineSurcoufthe.html

trboturtle

  • House of Commons
  • Airman
  • *******
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: IAQ's (infrequently asked questions)
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2010, 08:49:34 PM »
And don't forget the Surcouf -- closer to WW2 tech, but an example of a "main gun" submarine:

http://ahoy.tk-jk.net/macslog/FrenchSubmarineSurcoufthe.html

Apparently, a Sub that couldn't decided which side of the war to fight on.... :D

Craig